A clearer view before the next move
When everyone is working from a different version of what's happening.
Rapport takes the fragmented material of a real situation — a message, a note, a screenshot, a half-formed worry — and lays out what was actually said, what it read into it, what conflicts, and what nobody has settled yet.
It does not decide for you. It shows you the shape of the problem so the next move is yours.
The example takes about two minutes and uses fictional material — no account needed.
Illustrative example
A design project's scope changes
A client asks for more work, names a date that was never agreed, and leaves acceptance unclear.
A client asks for work that was not in the proposal, names a date that was never agreed, and leaves sign-off unclear. Rapport sorts the message into what the client asked for, what the designer read into it, what is still unknown about scope, deadline and acceptance, and the one question worth asking first.
What it separates, every time
What you reported
Kept in your own words, and separated from everything else.
What Rapport read into it
Labeled as its own reading, never as a fact about anyone.
What conflicts or is missing
Named plainly instead of smoothed over.
The one question that matters
The smallest question whose answer could change your next step.
What it will not do
- No scores for people — no blame, no trustworthiness, no personality reading.
- No decisions on your behalf, and no message sent to anyone without you.
- No claim that a reading is a fact, and no claim that a gap is closed.
How a brief is built
You bring the material — a message, a screenshot, a note to yourself. Rapport reads it, and you mark what it got right. Only what you submit is sent to the model, the brief stays private until you choose to copy it, and its readings are never presented as facts.
Run a pilot
Try this on your team's real situations.
We are looking for a small number of teams to run a six-week pilot: one real, current situation per participant, a short weekly conversation about what the brief got right and wrong, and a written summary at the end of what helped and what did not.
No pricing to agree, nothing to install, and nothing is shared between participants without consent. To be plain about it: this has not been run at scale yet, so there are no case studies, no measured savings, and no customer names to show you. What you would be evaluating is whether the brief helps someone decide their next step.